[Sun Jun  9 09:40:52 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (134.9, 271.4) = 18 1 15.41 -24 4 22.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 219.4 +/- 30.0
  Background counts = 88.7
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun  9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.02'
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.44"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.709
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 12.44"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 91
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 63909.700000, observed total counts = 793.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 94
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.44"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.709
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 12.44"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:40 2013] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 77
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:07 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(11686.060425, 23561.961334, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:07 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src.reg
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:07 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (97, 234) - (172, 309)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:07 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(11686.060425, 23561.961334, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11366.036469, 21957.578903, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11570.450000, 24778.086000, 1239.976036, 1239.976036, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11293.457260, 24038.594849, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11863.701797, 22120.094574, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:07 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.gif