[Sun Jun  9 09:40:55 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.7, 262.2) = 18 0 20.83 -24 4 52.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 140.7 +/- 21.4
  Background counts = 163.4
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun  9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.69'
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.77"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.195
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 7.77"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1412.440000, observed total counts = 1175.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 101
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 841.209000, observed total counts = 868.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 101 = 1.045887 pixels
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] 701.751000 total counts/ 455.131000 bgd. counts: snr = 11.560060
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 101 = 1.045887 pixels
  Position = (307.4, 263.0) = 18 0 20.61 -24 4 47.1
  Extent = 9.6 (4.2-12.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 246.6 +/- 26.5
  Background counts = 455.1
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 100
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.56"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.031
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 96 for pass 1, mean size = 9.56"
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src96.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src96.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src96_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src96.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src96_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src96.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src96.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src96.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src96_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src96.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src96_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src96.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Warning, spatial fit 96 centroid is now closest to src. 104
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:15 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26694.905200, 22834.246536, 573.540617, 573.540617, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:15 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src101_src.reg
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:15 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (274, 230) - (340, 296)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:15 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26694.905200, 22834.246536, 955.901028, 1911.802055, X, Y) && !ellipse(29471.629800, 25143.293000, 1282.528037, 1282.528037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24028.144653, 23773.516724, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25238.734467, 22975.311371, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24728.647583, 22977.252197, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25717.165436, 22938.316193, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26127.858643, 22863.370026, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28129.535675, 22385.881592, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28934.821991, 22042.753571, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24733.832855, 22292.044891, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26591.493134, 21956.850098, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25977.422028, 22128.026474, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28261.413635, 21537.318298, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29086.490540, 21275.201859, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25704.551392, 20828.494507, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26487.559357, 20634.410538, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25180.852173, 21001.680740, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26069.790497, 20572.394363, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:15 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src101.gif