[Mon Mar 26 05:27:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (293.2, 333.1) = 19 21 26.00 -58 38 50.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 56.6 +/- 12.9
  Background counts = 21.0
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Mar 26 05:27:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.54'
[Mon Mar 26 08:48:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 08:48:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.70"
[Mon Mar 26 08:48:00 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.776
[Mon Mar 26 08:48:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 7.70"
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:02 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:30 2012] Source 22 is offset by 7.325337 and -6.145826 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.079586 x 7.079586, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 26 15:13:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 26 17:39:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 17:39:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.70"
[Mon Mar 26 17:39:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.776
[Mon Mar 26 17:39:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 7.70"
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:38 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:44 2012] Source 22 is offset by -4.874295 and 4.531209 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.079586 x 1.677044, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 26 19:01:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9