[Fri May 18 09:23:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (276.5, 320.9) = 19 21 35.45 -58 39 45.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 110.3 +/- 14.7
  Background counts = 18.1
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006

[Fri May 18 09:23:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.28'
[Fri May 18 12:58:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 18 12:58:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.57"
[Fri May 18 12:58:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.997
[Fri May 18 12:58:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 7.57"
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 18 13:53:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Source 18 is offset by -2.962912 and 0.418940 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.950051 x 2.950051, not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 390.598000, observed total counts = 389.000000
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.094415 pixels
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] 380.672400 total counts/ 315.490000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.669759
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.094415 pixels
  Position = (276.4, 320.9) = 19 21 35.50 -58 39 45.8
  Extent = 4.4 (3.5-6.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 65.2 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 315.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 18 19:06:00 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9