[Sun Aug 19 05:42:30 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (235.8, 248.1) = 19 21 55.86 -58 45 13.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 277.6 +/- 20.7 Background counts = 33.9 Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0005 [Sun Aug 19 05:42:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.82' [Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.34" [Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.034 [Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 9.34" [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv [Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 19 21:28:35 2012] Source 9 is offset by 7.110371 and 6.348027 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 3.457205 x 3.457205, not incorporating fit results [Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.34" [Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.034 [Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 9.34" [Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists [Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists [Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv [Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv [Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Aug 21 04:17:42 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 621.175000, observed total counts = 536.000000 [Tue Aug 21 04:17:42 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Aug 21 14:11:15 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(20469.444275, 21534.120316, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Aug 21 14:11:15 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg [Tue Aug 21 14:11:15 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (198, 211) - (273, 286) [Tue Aug 21 14:11:15 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(20469.444275, 21534.120316, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17457.715775, 21617.484253, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Aug 21 14:11:15 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif [Tue Aug 21 14:41:23 2012] Mean detx,y = (7002.62, -5580.34) [Tue Aug 21 14:41:26 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Aug 21 14:42:16 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Aug 21 14:42:17 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Aug 21 14:42:17 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Aug 21 14:58:54 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Aug 21 14:58:54 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Aug 21 15:22:26 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Aug 21 15:22:26 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Aug 21 15:22:27 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Aug 21 15:22:27 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00635, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf [Tue Aug 21 15:22:27 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Aug 21 15:22:27 2012] Updating source flux to 1.2e-13 [Tue Aug 21 15:26:34 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting