[Sun Aug 19 05:42:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.0, 374.0) = 19 21 15.55 -58 36 5.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 113.0 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 48.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Aug 19 05:42:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.52'
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.19"
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.318
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 9.19"
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:35 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 16
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.19"
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.318
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 9.19"
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source 17 is offset by -5.842454 and -4.132613 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.104713 x 1.104713, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 859.680000, observed total counts = 778.000000
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9