[Sun Aug 19 05:42:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (304.8, 386.0) = 19 21 17.31 -58 35 12.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 109.3 +/- 15.0
  Background counts = 38.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Aug 19 05:42:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.36'
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.61"
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 32, frac = 1.090
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 9.61"
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:27:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:35 2012] Warning: source 22 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 13.336847 pixels away
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:35 2012] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 11.887835 pixels away
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.61"
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 32, frac = 1.090
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 9.61"
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 17
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9