[Sun Aug 19 05:41:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (239.1, 311.7) = 19 21 53.94 -58 40 37.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 75.7 +/- 12.8
  Background counts = 39.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Aug 19 05:41:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.41'
[Sun Aug 19 07:57:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 19 07:57:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.63"
[Sun Aug 19 07:57:50 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.608
[Sun Aug 19 07:57:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 8.63"
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Sun Aug 19 09:32:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 27 centroid is now closest to src. 43
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 19 21:28:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 20 01:02:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 01:02:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.63"
[Mon Aug 20 01:02:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.608
[Mon Aug 20 01:02:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 1, mean size = 8.63"
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 20 02:22:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503750101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 477.361000, observed total counts = 358.000000
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 44
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 21 04:17:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9