[Wed Mar 7 15:36:22 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (310.8, 241.9) = 11 50 20.04 -62 43 40.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 138.0 +/- 24.0 Background counts = 208.5 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003 [Wed Mar 7 15:36:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.19' [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.52" [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.033 [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 0, mean size = 8.52" [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 21:06:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Source 77 is offset by 1.264327 and 1.347085 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.958018 x 0.958018, not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1002.050000, observed total counts = 1904.000000 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 77 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 73 centroid is now closest to src. 76 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Source is confused with source 72 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.52" [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.033 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 8.52" [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 11:11:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2002.250000, observed total counts = 1904.000000 [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 77 = 0.440404 pixels [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 68 to 67 [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] 2009.487300 total counts/ 1994.560000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.334239 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 77 = 0.440404 pixels Position = (311.1, 241.6) = 11 50 19.85 -62 43 43.4 Extent = 2.3" x 2.3", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 14.9 +/- 44.8 Background counts = 1994.6 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.01 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability