[Wed Mar 7 15:36:21 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (240.9, 260.2) = 11 51 4.28 -62 42 21.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 88.0 +/- 20.2 Background counts = 174.7 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003 [Wed Mar 7 15:36:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.01' [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93" [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.958 [Wed Mar 7 15:43:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 0, mean size = 8.93" [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 21:06:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:06:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:06:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Source 63 is offset by 4.997968 and -6.393552 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.390267 x 0.996823, not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Source 63 is offset by -1.109159 and -5.131046 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.174129 x 1.174129, not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1362.900000, observed total counts = 1184.000000 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 63 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Mar 8 05:50:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93" [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.958 [Thu Mar 8 05:50:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 1, mean size = 8.93" [Thu Mar 8 11:11:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 11:11:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 11:11:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv [Thu Mar 8 11:11:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1355.440000, observed total counts = 1184.000000 [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 63 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Mar 8 21:48:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Mar 8 21:49:22 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(20909.405197, 22586.330994, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Thu Mar 8 21:49:22 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_src.reg [Thu Mar 8 21:49:22 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (203, 223) - (278, 298) [Thu Mar 8 21:49:22 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(20909.405197, 22586.330994, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21375.536000, 24940.920000, 1317.376038, 1317.376038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21555.699400, 25068.632000, 1317.376038, 1317.376038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21907.830200, 24973.964000, 1304.440038, 1304.440038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18949.850000, 23618.398000, 1555.136045, 1555.136045, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17143.708000, 20740.416000, 1703.104049, 1703.104049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18078.888000, 20503.940400, 3429.984099, 3429.984099, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19861.636383, 23619.782562, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20863.060000, 25997.854000, 1390.728040, 1390.728040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20085.966446, 24228.047119, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21004.002563, 23707.356049, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21845.232000, 23993.750000, 1352.320039, 974.256028, 69.528000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18501.013519, 23193.015808, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Thu Mar 8 21:49:22 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63.gif [Thu Mar 8 22:41:51 2012] Mean detx,y = (-7001.50, 1504.83) [Thu Mar 8 22:41:55 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Thu Mar 8 22:42:27 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Thu Mar 8 22:42:27 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_src_b10.pi.gz [Thu Mar 8 22:42:27 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_bgd.pi.gz [Fri Mar 9 00:03:20 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 87 counts [Fri Mar 9 00:03:20 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Fri Mar 9 05:25:38 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Fri Mar 9 05:25:38 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Mar 9 05:25:42 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Fri Mar 9 05:25:42 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.013, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63.arf [Fri Mar 9 05:25:42 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Fri Mar 9 05:25:42 2012] Updating source flux to 5.4e-14 [Fri Mar 9 05:40:38 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting