[Wed Mar  7 15:36:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (157.4, 319.2) = 11 51 56.86 -62 38 0.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 68.8 +/- 15.9
  Background counts = 77.0
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Wed Mar  7 15:36:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.34'
[Wed Mar  7 15:43:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar  7 15:43:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.60"
[Wed Mar  7 15:43:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.898
[Wed Mar  7 15:43:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 0, mean size = 11.60"
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Wed Mar  7 21:06:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:14 2012] Warning: source 48 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 51 at 14.222457 pixels away
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.60"
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.898
[Thu Mar  8 05:50:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 44 for pass 1, mean size = 11.60"
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.csv
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.csv
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44.csv
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44.csv
[Thu Mar  8 11:11:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Warning: source 44 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 51 at 14.222457 pixels away
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar  8 21:48:36 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0