[Thu Mar  8 00:54:58 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (438.5, 322.7) = 18 3 22.61 -21 37 37.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 176.9 +/- 17.7
  Background counts = 62.6
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0006

[Thu Mar  8 00:54:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.31'
[Thu Mar  8 00:58:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 00:58:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.58"
[Thu Mar  8 00:58:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.625
[Thu Mar  8 00:58:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 11.58"
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1306.000000, observed total counts = 853.000000
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar  8 19:54:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 19:54:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.58"
[Thu Mar  8 19:54:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.625
[Thu Mar  8 19:54:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 11.58"
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Fri Mar  9 08:39:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1303.900000, observed total counts = 853.000000
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5266.010000, observed total counts = 4191.000000
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar  9 19:36:32 2012] Source is confused with source 93
[Fri Mar  9 19:37:53 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(38103.652374, 28023.615936, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Mar  9 19:37:53 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src.reg
[Fri Mar  9 19:37:53 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (401, 285) - (476, 360)
[Fri Mar  9 19:37:53 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(38103.652374, 28023.615936, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40710.750427, 28625.739410, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37808.750305, 28838.261230, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39006.970000, 28451.552000, 1929.104056, 1929.104056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39640.919647, 27936.655762, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40104.118000, 28502.604000, 1454.088042, 1454.088042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38963.865936, 27984.342743, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40658.589722, 27862.662750, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39336.446198, 27446.470978, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37256.542000, 26565.640200, 1762.080051, 1762.080051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39360.786600, 26522.766000, 1929.104056, 1929.104056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37744.769409, 26509.468658, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40703.905762, 26218.477448, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40202.553925, 26213.743530, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39538.260284, 26247.881897, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Mar  9 19:37:53 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.gif
[Fri Mar  9 21:04:00 2012] Mean detx,y = (11095.44, -798.93) 
[Fri Mar  9 21:04:05 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Mar  9 21:04:27 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Mar  9 21:04:27 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Mar  9 21:04:27 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri Mar  9 23:39:37 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Fri Mar  9 23:39:37 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat Mar 10 04:28:28 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat Mar 10 04:28:28 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 10 04:28:33 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat Mar 10 04:28:33 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0058, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.arf
[Sat Mar 10 04:28:33 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat Mar 10 04:28:33 2012] Updating source flux to 3.4e-14
[Sat Mar 10 04:43:09 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting