[Thu Mar 8 00:54:56 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (193.7, 478.1) = 18 4 38.96 -21 26 28.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 204.6 +/- 21.6 Background counts = 59.0 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0007 [Thu Mar 8 00:54:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.08' [Thu Mar 8 00:58:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Mar 8 00:58:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.97" [Thu Mar 8 00:58:45 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.871 [Thu Mar 8 00:58:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.97" [Thu Mar 8 09:35:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 09:35:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Thu Mar 8 09:35:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 09:35:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Thu Mar 8 09:35:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 09:35:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 09:35:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Thu Mar 8 09:35:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 8 09:35:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Thu Mar 8 09:35:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 20 [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Source is confused with source 8 [Thu Mar 8 19:53:05 2012] Source is confused with source 20 [Thu Mar 8 19:54:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Mar 8 19:54:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.97" [Thu Mar 8 19:54:10 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.871 [Thu Mar 8 19:54:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.97" [Fri Mar 9 08:39:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Fri Mar 9 08:39:44 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Mar 9 08:39:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 9 08:39:44 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Mar 9 08:39:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Mar 9 08:39:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Mar 9 08:39:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Mar 9 08:39:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 9 08:39:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Mar 9 08:39:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1443.180000, observed total counts = 1220.000000 [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Source 9 is offset by 2.164252 and 7.574454 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.812258 x 1.812258, not incorporating fit results [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 7 [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2831.780000, observed total counts = 2728.000000 [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.362775 pixels [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 23 [Fri Mar 9 19:36:32 2012] 2464.240092 total counts/ 2464.240000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000002 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.362775 pixels Position = (191.5, 475.5) = 18 4 39.65 -21 26 41.1 Extent = 25.1" x 25.1", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 49.6 Background counts = 2464.2 Rate = 3e-09 +/- 0.002 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability