[Thu Mar  8 00:55:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (179.7, 173.5) = 18 4 43.42 -21 48 41.5
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 24.8 +/- 7.7
  Background counts = 38.2
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Mar  8 00:55:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.50'
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.68"
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.708
[Thu Mar  8 09:35:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 12.68"
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Thu Mar  8 16:24:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 7
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 32 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 48 centroid is now closest to src. 48
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 68 centroid is now closest to src. 77
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 70 centroid is now closest to src. 71
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 83 centroid is now closest to src. 84
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 84 centroid is now closest to src. 78
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 11 centroid is now closest to src. 9
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 37 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 56 centroid is now closest to src. 43
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Warning: source 67 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 66 at 16.320431 pixels away
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar  8 19:53:25 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9