[Sun Jul 15 18:55:10 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (414.2, 451.2) = 18 3 30.24 -21 28 25.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 211.6 +/- 19.7 Background counts = 56.8 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0007 [Sun Jul 15 18:55:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.89' [Sun Jul 15 18:58:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jul 15 18:58:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.38" [Sun Jul 15 18:58:39 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.685 [Sun Jul 15 18:58:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 13.38" [Mon Jul 16 02:33:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 02:33:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 02:33:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 02:33:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 02:33:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 16 02:33:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 02:33:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 02:33:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 02:33:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 02:33:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 16 08:58:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 776.310000, observed total counts = 668.000000 [Mon Jul 16 08:58:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Jul 16 08:58:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jul 16 08:58:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jul 16 08:58:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jul 16 08:58:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jul 16 08:58:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jul 16 08:59:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jul 16 08:59:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.38" [Mon Jul 16 08:59:15 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.685 [Mon Jul 16 08:59:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 13.38" [Mon Jul 16 19:18:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 19:18:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 19:18:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 19:18:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 19:18:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 16 19:18:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 19:18:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 19:18:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 19:18:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Mon Jul 16 19:18:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 779.408000, observed total counts = 668.000000 [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 17 03:16:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 17 03:17:15 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(35984.952271, 39202.975220, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jul 17 03:17:15 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_src.reg [Tue Jul 17 03:17:15 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (377, 414) - (452, 489) [Tue Jul 17 03:17:15 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(35984.952271, 39202.975220, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jul 17 03:17:15 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18.gif [Tue Jul 17 03:33:43 2012] Mean detx,y = (8911.75, -11915.28) [Tue Jul 17 03:33:47 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Jul 17 03:34:11 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Jul 17 03:34:11 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jul 17 03:34:11 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Jul 17 05:09:39 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Jul 17 05:09:39 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Jul 17 11:18:19 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Jul 17 11:18:19 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jul 17 11:18:25 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Jul 17 11:18:25 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00704, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0503170201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18.arf [Tue Jul 17 11:18:25 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Jul 17 11:18:25 2012] Updating source flux to 1.5e-13 [Tue Jul 17 11:37:01 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting