[Sun Feb 19 14:17:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (448.0, 302.7) = 18 3 19.71 -21 39 15.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 198.5 +/- 21.8
  Background counts = 69.8
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Feb 19 14:17:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.85'
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.85"
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.010
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 11.85"
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 94 centroid is now closest to src. 100
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:05 2012] Source 95 is offset by 5.669163 and 7.072811 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.296207 x 1.296207, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Source is confused with source 94
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Source is confused with source 98
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.85"
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.010
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 1, mean size = 11.85"
[Tue Feb 21 00:15:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src90.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:15:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src90_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:15:58 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src90 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src90 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1199.130000, observed total counts = 1197.000000
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 95 = 2.303426 pixels
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] 1031.313000 total counts/ 655.995000 bgd. counts: snr = 14.653762
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 95 = 2.303426 pixels
  Position = (450.3, 302.4) = 18 3 19.00 -21 39 16.2
  Extent = 22.1 (19.1-23.7)" x 4.3 (3.7-5.1)", rotation angle = 7 (5-10) degrees
  Source counts = 375.3 +/- 32.1
  Background counts = 656.0
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0008
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 3.77
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Tue Feb 21 07:34:24 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(39129.892000, 26263.169400, 1323.414038, 257.182207, 7.409170, X, Y)
[Tue Feb 21 07:34:24 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src.reg
[Tue Feb 21 07:34:24 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (374, 226) - (526, 378)
[Tue Feb 21 07:34:24 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(39129.892000, 26263.169400, 2205.690063, 4411.380127, X, Y) && !ellipse(40710.020294, 28609.469391, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39960.099304, 28649.265625, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33269.838000, 29046.849400, 1588.800046, 1588.800046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39110.384800, 28593.626000, 3894.576112, 3894.576112, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38538.107400, 28699.936000, 593.052017, 593.052017, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40176.526672, 27854.790588, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38091.911835, 28002.877502, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40412.368400, 27819.573600, 1267.808036, 500.935214, 4.870000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39448.540000, 27713.774000, 693.877620, 693.877620, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37641.937400, 26450.686800, 1804.320052, 1804.320052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38050.486340, 26407.974000, 571.460016, 272.647208, 19.975000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39447.840607, 26224.830933, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40582.108948, 26148.254578, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37812.957400, 23997.564020, 677.893620, 677.893620, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39860.514465, 29243.668274, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Feb 21 07:34:24 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.gif
[Tue Feb 21 10:13:16 2012] Mean detx,y = (12235.60, 1036.81) 
[Tue Feb 21 10:13:22 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Feb 21 10:14:21 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Feb 21 10:14:21 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Feb 21 10:14:21 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Feb 21 20:29:07 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Feb 21 20:29:07 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Feb 21 20:29:13 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Feb 21 20:29:13 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0093, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.arf
[Tue Feb 21 20:29:13 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Feb 21 20:29:13 2012] Updating source flux to 5e-14
[Tue Feb 21 20:40:39 2012] Flag b found in src. 95 procflags, skipping spectral fitting
[Tue Feb 21 20:40:39 2012] Flag c found in src. 95 procflags, skipping spectral fitting