[Sun Feb 19 14:17:11 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (178.6, 166.5) = 18 4 43.83 -21 49 7.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 75.2 +/- 15.0
  Background counts = 45.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Feb 19 14:17:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.92'
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.89"
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.021
[Sun Feb 19 14:22:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 12.89"
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:13 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:05 2012] Warning: source 50 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 50 at 11.163718 pixels away
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.89"
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.021
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 12.89"
[Tue Feb 21 00:15:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:15:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:15:56 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:00 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1051.000000, observed total counts = 1051.000000
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 0.336866 pixels
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:38 2012] 1057.758500 total counts/ 1019.350000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.203000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 0.336866 pixels
  Position = (178.9, 166.6) = 18 4 43.73 -21 49 7.0
  Extent = 4.2 (3.2-6.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 38.4 +/- 32.5
  Background counts = 1019.4
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0008
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability