[Sun Feb 19 14:18:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (222.7, 425.7) = 18 4 30.01 -21 30 19.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.7 +/- 11.6
  Background counts = 15.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0009

[Sun Feb 19 14:18:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.74'
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.80"
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.017
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 11.80"
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 07:58:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:27 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.80"
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.017
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 11.80"
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:56 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:56 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 07:32:57 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:58 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 326.712000, observed total counts = 326.000000
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:58 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.189360 pixels
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:58 2012] 342.200100 total counts/ 315.136000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.524560
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.189360 pixels
  Position = (222.6, 425.6) = 18 4 30.02 -21 30 20.9
  Extent = 4.1 (2.9-6.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 27.1 +/- 18.5
  Background counts = 315.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability