[Sun Feb 19 14:18:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (479.0, 321.9) = 18 3 10.07 -21 37 52.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 369.7 +/- 25.4
  Background counts = 25.3
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0006

[Sun Feb 19 14:18:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.20'
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.03"
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.003
[Mon Feb 20 01:36:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.03"
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 06:25:09 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Source 7 is offset by -1.985183 and 1.924149 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.567315 x 1.567315, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 07:59:20 2012] Source is confused with source 18
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.03"
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.003
[Tue Feb 21 00:16:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.03"
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 21 05:29:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0503170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1113.250000, observed total counts = 1097.000000
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 1.886684 pixels
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 15
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] 742.780700 total counts/ 675.848000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.574624
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 1.886684 pixels
  Position = (480.0, 320.3) = 18 3 9.75 -21 37 58.3
  Extent = 5.5 (5.2-5.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 66.9 +/- 27.3
  Background counts = 675.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 616.466000, observed total counts = 616.000000
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 1.029853 pixels
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 15 to 37
[Tue Feb 21 07:33:51 2012] 232.559000 total counts/ 232.559000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 1.029853 pixels
  Position = (481.0, 320.0) = 18 3 9.45 -21 37 59.8
  Extent = 3.4 (3.4-51.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 15.2
  Background counts = 232.6
  Rate = 7e-18 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability