[Fri Feb 17 13:40:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (258.8, 271.4) = 14 13 56.59 43 36 10.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 94.3 +/- 17.3
  Background counts = 92.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Fri Feb 17 13:40:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.48'
[Fri Feb 17 13:48:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Feb 17 13:48:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Fri Feb 17 13:48:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.105
[Fri Feb 17 13:48:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 8.17"
[Fri Feb 17 13:55:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 13:55:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 13:55:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 17 13:55:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 13:55:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 13:55:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 17 14:11:56 2012] Source 6 is offset by 5.353164 and -8.092638 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.941210 x 0.941210, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Feb 17 14:11:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Feb 17 14:11:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Feb 17 14:11:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Feb 17 14:11:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Feb 17 14:11:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Feb 17 14:39:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Feb 17 14:39:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Fri Feb 17 14:39:15 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.105
[Fri Feb 17 14:39:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 8.17"
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 14:45:16 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 17 15:05:03 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 648.998000, observed total counts = 649.000000
[Fri Feb 17 15:05:03 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 0.124245 pixels
[Fri Feb 17 15:05:03 2012] 653.069800 total counts/ 615.249000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.524773
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 0.124245 pixels
  Position = (258.7, 271.3) = 14 13 56.63 43 36 10.1
  Extent = 4.2 (2.0-7.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 37.8 +/- 25.6
  Background counts = 615.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability