[Tue Jun 26 18:42:54 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (411.5, 207.1) = 11 54 42.44 23 19 19.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 85.4 +/- 15.1 Background counts = 61.5 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002 [Tue Jun 26 18:42:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.54' [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.70" [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.885 [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 11.70" [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source 97 is offset by -0.963686 and 1.720201 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.306703 x 1.306703, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 93 centroid is now closest to src. 95 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9