[Tue Jun 26 18:42:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (515.0, 207.9) = 11 54 9.74 23 19 24.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 124.6 +/- 17.9
  Background counts = 58.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Jun 26 18:42:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 17.02'
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.94"
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] source mask rpix=3.4, npix_max = 61, mask sum = 52, frac = 0.840
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 14.94"
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1202.080000, observed total counts = 820.000000
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 96
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.94"
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] source mask rpix=3.4, npix_max = 61, mask sum = 52, frac = 0.840
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 14.94"
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Warning: source 69 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 96 at 14.373532 pixels away
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0