[Tue Jun 26 18:42:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (402.0, 209.9) = 11 54 45.44 23 19 35.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 105.9 +/- 15.0
  Background counts = 61.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Jun 26 18:42:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.88'
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.37"
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.696
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 11.37"
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 95 at 11.883819 pixels away
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 97
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source 95 is offset by 1.742481 and 0.871445 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.554676 x 1.554676, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Warning: source 94 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 95 at 10.462345 pixels away
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9