[Tue Jun 26 18:42:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (278.3, 211.2) = 11 55 24.51 23 19 37.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 115.5 +/- 21.8
  Background counts = 184.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Tue Jun 26 18:42:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.49'
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.68"
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.011
[Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 9.68"
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2118.920000, observed total counts = 1873.000000
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 94
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.68"
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.011
[Wed Jun 27 03:29:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 9.68"
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:01:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2156.220000, observed total counts = 1873.000000
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 94
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 09:30:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9