[Tue Jun 26 18:42:54 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (299.1, 176.8) = 11 55 17.93 23 17 11.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 79.5 +/- 13.8 Background counts = 105.9 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002 [Tue Jun 26 18:42:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.82' [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.84" [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.754 [Tue Jun 26 18:49:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 10.84" [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:17:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv [Tue Jun 26 22:18:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source 102 is offset by 3.034084 and 7.742428 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.241370 x 1.241370, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 98 centroid is now closest to src. 100 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 27 03:28:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9