[Mon Mar 5 15:52:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (156.0, 332.4) = 11 56 3.50 23 28 28.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 116.3 +/- 16.4 Background counts = 85.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Mon Mar 5 15:52:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.62' [Mon Mar 5 15:56:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 5 15:56:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.74" [Mon Mar 5 15:56:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.929 [Mon Mar 5 15:56:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 0, mean size = 11.74" [Mon Mar 5 18:10:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 18:10:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 18:10:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 18:10:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 18:10:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 5 18:10:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 18:10:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 18:10:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 18:10:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 18:10:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 5 19:49:49 2012] Warning: source 32 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 37 at 16.052344 pixels away [Mon Mar 5 19:49:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 5 19:49:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 5 19:49:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 5 19:49:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 5 19:49:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 5 19:50:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 5 19:50:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.74" [Mon Mar 5 19:50:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.929 [Mon Mar 5 19:50:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 1, mean size = 11.74" [Mon Mar 5 21:41:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 21:41:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 21:41:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 21:41:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 21:41:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 5 21:41:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 21:41:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 21:41:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 5 21:41:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.csv [Mon Mar 5 21:41:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Warning: source 32 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 37 at 14.119930 pixels away [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 5 22:48:03 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0