[Mon Mar  5 15:52:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (367.6, 451.0) = 11 54 56.57 23 37 2.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 108.7 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 83.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Mon Mar  5 15:52:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.14'
[Mon Mar  5 15:56:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar  5 15:56:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.50"
[Mon Mar  5 15:56:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.505
[Mon Mar  5 15:56:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 12.50"
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:48 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 15.318668 pixels away
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar  5 19:50:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar  5 19:50:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.50"
[Mon Mar  5 19:50:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.505
[Mon Mar  5 19:50:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 12.50"
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Mon Mar  5 21:41:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 15.318668 pixels away
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar  5 22:48:03 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9