[Mon Mar  5 15:52:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (412.1, 281.0) = 11 54 42.56 23 24 41.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.9 +/- 15.4
  Background counts = 68.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Mon Mar  5 15:52:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.33'
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.60"
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.044
[Mon Mar  5 18:10:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 10.60"
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar  5 19:39:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Source 32 is offset by -5.668948 and 2.519996 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.217899 x 1.217899, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar  5 19:49:58 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9