[Fri Jul 13 17:56:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (278.4, 303.7) = 9 57 57.54 65 35 26.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 36.0 +/- 8.5
  Background counts = 11.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Jul 13 17:56:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.50'
[Fri Jul 13 18:32:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 13 18:32:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.18"
[Fri Jul 13 18:32:52 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.081
[Fri Jul 13 18:32:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 7.18"
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:30 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:30 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:38 2012] Source 10 is offset by -6.209842 and -6.905032 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.825264 x 0.825264, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 13 18:52:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 13 19:27:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 13 19:27:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.18"
[Fri Jul 13 19:27:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.081
[Fri Jul 13 19:27:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 7.18"
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:31 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0502430701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 156.328000, observed total counts = 146.000000
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.199228 pixels
[Fri Jul 13 19:44:38 2012] 155.397600 total counts/ 136.787000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.591248
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.199228 pixels
  Position = (278.3, 303.9) = 9 57 57.63 65 35 26.1
  Extent = 2.6 (1.8-4.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 18.6 +/- 12.5
  Background counts = 136.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability