[Mon Oct 31 20:36:15 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (315.4, 303.9) = 8 31 34.04 52 47 22.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 92.9 +/- 18.2
  Background counts = 108.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Mon Oct 31 20:36:16 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.29'
[Mon Oct 31 22:13:49 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 31 22:13:49 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.08"
[Mon Oct 31 22:13:49 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.106
[Mon Oct 31 22:13:49 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 7.08"
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 31 23:07:31 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Mon Oct 31 23:51:51 2011] Source 18 is offset by 4.750379 and -6.648938 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.110977 x 1.110977, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Oct 31 23:51:51 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 31 23:51:51 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 31 23:51:51 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 31 23:51:51 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 31 23:51:51 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Nov  1 01:29:25 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Nov  1 01:29:25 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.08"
[Tue Nov  1 01:29:25 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.106
[Tue Nov  1 01:29:25 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 7.08"
[Tue Nov  1 02:07:27 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 02:07:27 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 02:07:27 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23 appears to have run properly
[Tue Nov  1 02:07:27 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 02:07:27 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 02:07:27 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0502220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Tue Nov  1 02:54:27 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 596.906000, observed total counts = 597.000000
[Tue Nov  1 02:54:28 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.191766 pixels
[Tue Nov  1 02:54:28 2011] 592.620300 total counts/ 560.401000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.361027
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.191766 pixels
  Position = (315.6, 304.0) = 8 31 33.99 52 47 22.6
  Extent = 2.4 (1.8-3.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 32.2 +/- 24.3
  Background counts = 560.4
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability