[Mon Oct 31 20:39:42 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (269.9, 237.7) = 12 43 46.74 11 30 25.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 141.8 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 165.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Mon Oct 31 20:39:43 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.86'
[Mon Oct 31 20:45:05 2011] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 31 20:45:05 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86"
[Mon Oct 31 20:45:05 2011] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.932
[Mon Oct 31 20:45:05 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 96 for pass 0, mean size = 8.86"
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:57 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.csv
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:57 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.csv
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:57 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:58 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src96.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:58 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src96_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 01:27:58 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src96 appears to have run properly
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 2294.670000, observed total counts = 2288.000000
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 105 = 1.653928 pixels
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 96 to 92
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] 2502.780000 total counts/ 2343.130000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.298152
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 105 = 1.653928 pixels
  Position = (269.5, 239.3) = 12 43 46.87 11 30 30.3
  Extent = 16.9 (15.4-33.9)" x 4.6 (4.3-5.1)", rotation angle = 71 (68-75) degrees
  Source counts = 159.7 +/- 50.0
  Background counts = 2343.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 3.02
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:07 2011] Source is confused with source 101
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:36 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:36 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.76"
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:36 2011] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.736
[Tue Nov  1 06:35:36 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 1, mean size = 10.76"
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:32 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:32 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.csv
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:32 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:32 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.csv
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:32 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:33 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:33 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov  1 09:43:33 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0502160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87 appears to have run properly
[Tue Nov  1 12:58:45 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 2335.740000, observed total counts = 2288.000000
[Tue Nov  1 12:58:45 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 105 = 0.188105 pixels
[Tue Nov  1 12:58:45 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 87 to 84
[Tue Nov  1 12:58:45 2011] 2605.145600 total counts/ 2532.600000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.441544
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 105 = 0.188105 pixels
  Position = (269.5, 239.5) = 12 43 46.88 11 30 31.1
  Extent = 2.1 (2.1-2.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 72.5 +/- 51.0
  Background counts = 2532.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability