[Thu Jul 5 07:09:39 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (225.4, 311.9) = 16 36 17.61 -47 32 53.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 422.6 +/- 31.1 Background counts = 232.8 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0005 [Thu Jul 5 07:09:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.39' [Thu Jul 5 07:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jul 5 07:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.12" [Thu Jul 5 07:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.112 [Thu Jul 5 07:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 9.12" [Thu Jul 5 13:36:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists [Thu Jul 5 13:36:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv [Thu Jul 5 13:36:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 5 13:36:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv [Thu Jul 5 13:36:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jul 5 13:36:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists [Thu Jul 5 13:36:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv [Thu Jul 5 13:36:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 5 13:36:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv [Thu Jul 5 13:36:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1831.610000, observed total counts = 1575.000000 [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 68 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jul 5 17:04:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jul 5 17:04:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jul 5 17:04:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.12" [Thu Jul 5 17:04:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.112 [Thu Jul 5 17:04:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 9.12" [Fri Jul 6 01:28:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists [Fri Jul 6 01:28:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv [Fri Jul 6 01:28:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 6 01:28:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv [Fri Jul 6 01:28:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jul 6 01:29:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists [Fri Jul 6 01:29:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv [Fri Jul 6 01:29:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 6 01:29:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv [Fri Jul 6 01:29:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jul 6 04:35:19 2012] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 68 at 12.397581 pixels away [Fri Jul 6 04:35:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jul 6 04:35:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jul 6 04:35:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jul 6 04:35:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jul 6 04:35:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jul 6 04:35:47 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(19558.591339, 27089.709381, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Jul 6 04:35:47 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_src.reg [Fri Jul 6 04:35:47 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (188, 274) - (263, 349) [Fri Jul 6 04:35:47 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(19558.591339, 27089.709381, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17892.750290, 28904.867950, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16830.133224, 27890.670654, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Jul 6 04:35:47 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68.gif [Fri Jul 6 06:19:06 2012] Mean detx,y = (5365.07, 2680.32) [Fri Jul 6 06:19:09 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri Jul 6 06:19:26 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri Jul 6 06:19:26 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Jul 6 06:19:26 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_bgd.pi.gz [Fri Jul 6 07:46:00 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Fri Jul 6 07:46:00 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Fri Jul 6 10:03:47 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Fri Jul 6 10:03:47 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Jul 6 10:03:49 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Fri Jul 6 10:03:49 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00691, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0502140101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68.arf [Fri Jul 6 10:03:49 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Fri Jul 6 10:03:49 2012] Updating source flux to 2.3e-14 [Fri Jul 6 10:12:45 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting