[Fri Aug 17 13:58:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (304.2, 244.5) = 12 14 13.99 14 0 58.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 93.4 +/- 17.0
  Background counts = 107.4
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Aug 17 13:58:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.93'
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.40"
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.974
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 8.40"
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 10.437644 pixels away
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 548.844000, observed total counts = 497.000000
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Source is confused with source 15
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.40"
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.974
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 8.40"
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 410.234000, observed total counts = 342.000000
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 553.023000, observed total counts = 497.000000
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9