[Fri Aug 17 13:58:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.3, 259.6) = 12 14 18.45 14 2 7.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 104.9 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 105.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Aug 17 13:58:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.89'
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87"
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.078
[Fri Aug 17 15:19:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 7.87"
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 15
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 16:00:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87"
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.078
[Fri Aug 17 16:41:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.87"
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0502050201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 11.447644 pixels away
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 17:07:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9