[Tue Mar 13 13:31:15 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (382.3, 211.7) = 1 37 13.18 -13 2 37.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 508.1 +/- 149.8 Background counts = 320.8 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002 [Tue Mar 13 13:31:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.75' [Tue Mar 13 13:40:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 13 13:40:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.80" [Tue Mar 13 13:40:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.730 [Tue Mar 13 13:40:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 10.80" [Tue Mar 13 16:52:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 16:52:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Tue Mar 13 16:52:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 16:52:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Tue Mar 13 16:52:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 13 16:52:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 16:52:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv [Tue Mar 13 16:52:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 16:52:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv [Tue Mar 13 16:52:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 13 21:54:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 648.882000, observed total counts = 456.000000 [Tue Mar 13 21:54:39 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 13 21:54:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 13 21:54:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 13 21:54:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 13 21:54:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 13 21:54:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 13 21:55:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 13 21:55:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.80" [Tue Mar 13 21:55:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.730 [Tue Mar 13 21:55:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 10.80" [Wed Mar 14 00:24:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Wed Mar 14 00:24:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Wed Mar 14 00:24:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 14 00:24:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Wed Mar 14 00:24:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 14 00:24:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Wed Mar 14 00:24:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Wed Mar 14 00:24:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 14 00:24:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Wed Mar 14 00:24:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 648.679000, observed total counts = 456.000000 [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 14 05:41:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 14 05:42:12 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33215.254913, 18371.221085, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 14 05:42:12 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src.reg [Wed Mar 14 05:42:12 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (345, 174) - (420, 249) [Wed Mar 14 05:42:12 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33215.254913, 18371.221085, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 14 05:42:12 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.gif [Wed Mar 14 06:03:33 2012] Mean detx,y = (-11216.79, -1433.27) [Wed Mar 14 06:03:36 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Mar 14 06:04:10 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Mar 14 06:04:10 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 14 06:04:10 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Mar 14 06:45:17 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed Mar 14 06:45:17 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Mar 14 18:05:08 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Mar 14 18:05:08 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 14 18:05:11 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Mar 14 18:05:11 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00774, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0502020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.arf [Wed Mar 14 18:05:11 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Mar 14 18:05:11 2012] Updating source flux to 7e-14 [Wed Mar 14 18:15:17 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting