[Wed Mar 28 09:49:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (183.5, 379.7) = 21 7 46.01 38 49 45.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 47.7 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 14.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Wed Mar 28 09:49:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.21'
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.53"
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.057
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.53"
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 12.030727 pixels away
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.53"
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.057
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.53"
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:30 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Source 9 is offset by -4.778881 and -6.743454 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.949196 x 1.558782, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 12.019410 pixels away
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0