[Wed Mar 28 09:49:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (366.0, 399.2) = 21 6 38.06 38 51 10.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 36.2 +/- 9.0
  Background counts = 14.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Wed Mar 28 09:49:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.79'
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.83"
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.008
[Wed Mar 28 09:51:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 10.83"
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:35:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 202.051000, observed total counts = 146.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.83"
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.008
[Wed Mar 28 11:24:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 10.83"
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:00:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501930601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 177.491000, observed total counts = 146.000000
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 13:02:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9