[Fri Apr  6 15:44:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (202.0, 250.3) = 8 10 46.81 -49 17 31.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 842.0 +/- 38.6
  Background counts = 196.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Apr  6 15:44:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.82'
[Fri Apr  6 15:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 15:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.34"
[Fri Apr  6 15:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.665
[Fri Apr  6 15:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 0, mean size = 10.34"
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:15 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60 appears to have run properly
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Fri Apr  6 17:38:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 169
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 21:14:44 2012] Source is confused with source 120
[Fri Apr  6 21:15:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 21:15:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.34"
[Fri Apr  6 21:15:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.665
[Fri Apr  6 21:15:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 10.34"
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Fri Apr  6 23:40:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 169
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Warning: source 91 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 64 at 11.673644 pixels away
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Apr  7 03:14:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Apr  7 03:15:30 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(17523.269775, 21724.333252, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Apr  7 03:15:30 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src.reg
[Sat Apr  7 03:15:30 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (164, 213) - (239, 288)
[Sat Apr  7 03:15:30 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(17523.269775, 21724.333252, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17148.998260, 24349.376648, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16558.817108, 23623.486328, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20540.066727, 22624.741302, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15694.735168, 20331.284515, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19432.031403, 22361.051758, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17269.340118, 22146.997986, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15372.775696, 24323.235229, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17272.982819, 22923.089600, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Apr  7 03:15:30 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64.gif
[Sat Apr  7 04:49:11 2012] Mean detx,y = (8267.00, 1070.65) 
[Sat Apr  7 04:49:16 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Apr  7 04:49:34 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Apr  7 04:49:34 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Apr  7 04:49:34 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Apr  7 08:59:40 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Apr  7 08:59:40 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Apr  8 04:47:06 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Apr  8 04:47:06 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Apr  8 04:47:09 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Apr  8 04:47:09 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0129, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0501790101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64.arf
[Sun Apr  8 04:47:09 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Apr  8 04:47:09 2012] Updating source flux to 6e-14
[Sun Apr  8 04:58:48 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting