[Sun Apr 1 16:43:51 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (482.7, 200.2) = 22 1 40.48 42 9 19.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 74.6 +/- 11.2 Background counts = 6.4 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Sun Apr 1 16:43:52 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.14' [Sun Apr 1 18:25:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Apr 1 18:25:47 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sun Apr 1 18:25:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.00" [Sun Apr 1 18:25:47 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.013 [Sun Apr 1 18:25:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 14.00" [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sun Apr 1 18:47:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Apr 1 18:47:58 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 15.210699 pixels away [Sun Apr 1 18:47:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Apr 1 18:47:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Apr 1 18:47:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Apr 1 18:47:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Apr 1 18:47:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Apr 1 19:39:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Apr 1 19:39:05 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sun Apr 1 19:39:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.00" [Sun Apr 1 19:39:05 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.013 [Sun Apr 1 19:39:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 14.00" [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6 appears to have run properly [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv [Sun Apr 1 19:55:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 167.256000, observed total counts = 153.000000 [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 0.160633 pixels [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] 164.960500 total counts/ 116.115000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.532944 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 0.160633 pixels Position = (482.6, 200.1) = 22 1 40.55 42 9 20.0 Extent = 9.1 (6.2-13.1)", rotation angle = 102 (83-118) degrees Source counts = 48.8 +/- 12.8 Background counts = 116.1 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006 [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.10 [Sun Apr 1 19:55:55 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9