[Sun Apr  1 16:43:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (323.8, 287.9) = 22 2 42.62 42 15 46.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 49.7 +/- 12.8
  Background counts = 12.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Apr  1 16:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.99'
[Sun Apr  1 17:14:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Apr  1 17:14:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.43"
[Sun Apr  1 17:14:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.719
[Sun Apr  1 17:14:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.43"
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Apr  1 18:25:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Apr  1 18:47:55 2012] Source 8 is offset by -0.680684 and -6.960301 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.123867 x 3.123867, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Apr  1 18:47:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Apr  1 18:47:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Apr  1 18:47:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Apr  1 18:47:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Apr  1 18:47:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Apr  1 18:52:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Apr  1 18:52:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.43"
[Sun Apr  1 18:52:39 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.719
[Sun Apr  1 18:52:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.43"
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Apr  1 19:39:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501660401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 10.412525 pixels away
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Source 8 is offset by -0.779947 and -6.576761 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.699968 x 2.227825, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Apr  1 19:55:54 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0