[Sun Mar 18 18:03:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (329.9, 312.1) = 22 2 38.82 42 16 49.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 53.0 +/- 12.2
  Background counts = 13.0
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Sun Mar 18 18:03:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.48'
[Sun Mar 18 19:27:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 19:27:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67"
[Sun Mar 18 19:27:36 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.634
[Sun Mar 18 19:27:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 7.67"
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 13.664560 pixels away
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 12.662301 pixels away
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 20:11:15 2012] Source is confused with source 9
[Sun Mar 18 20:57:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 20:57:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67"
[Sun Mar 18 20:57:15 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.634
[Sun Mar 18 20:57:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 7.67"
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501660301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Source 8 is offset by 6.781524 and -0.256260 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.480598 x 4.061099, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 21:24:56 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9