[Sun May 20 09:28:48 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (231.6, 276.2) = 0 55 55.37 46 10 13.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 46.4 +/- 8.4
  Background counts = 7.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Sun May 20 09:28:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.11'
[Sun May 20 11:29:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 11:29:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.98"
[Sun May 20 11:29:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.608
[Sun May 20 11:29:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 8.98"
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun May 20 12:16:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 12:16:47 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 12.699210 pixels away
[Sun May 20 12:16:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 12:16:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 12:16:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 12:16:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 12:16:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 14:24:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 14:24:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.98"
[Sun May 20 14:24:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.608
[Sun May 20 14:24:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.98"
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun May 20 15:05:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0501230301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 15:05:23 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 11.854676 pixels away
[Sun May 20 15:05:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 15:05:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 15:05:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 15:05:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 15:05:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 15:05:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9