[Tue Aug 14 22:57:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (176.7, 255.5) = 0 23 59.88 61 38 56.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.8 +/- 8.5
  Background counts = 10.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Tue Aug 14 22:57:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.36'
[Wed Aug 15 00:21:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 15 00:21:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.11"
[Wed Aug 15 00:21:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.126
[Wed Aug 15 00:21:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 11.11"
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed Aug 15 00:41:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 01:00:44 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 14.996734 pixels away
[Wed Aug 15 01:00:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 15 01:00:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 15 01:00:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 15 01:00:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 15 01:00:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 15 02:24:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 15 02:24:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.11"
[Wed Aug 15 02:24:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.126
[Wed Aug 15 02:24:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.11"
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed Aug 15 02:43:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 13.892285 pixels away
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 15 03:02:00 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9