[Sat Apr 28 04:46:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (116.5, 266.2) = 8 55 22.35 15 0 51.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 53.9 +/- 10.4
  Background counts = 13.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Apr 28 04:46:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.40'
[Sat Apr 28 05:27:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Apr 28 05:27:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.13"
[Sat Apr 28 05:27:40 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.990
[Sat Apr 28 05:27:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 13.13"
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 05:46:08 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly
[Sat Apr 28 06:14:07 2012] Warning: source 21 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 13.671680 pixels away
[Sat Apr 28 06:14:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Apr 28 06:14:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Apr 28 06:14:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Apr 28 06:14:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Apr 28 06:14:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Apr 28 06:50:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Apr 28 06:50:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.13"
[Sat Apr 28 06:50:10 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.990
[Sat Apr 28 06:50:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 13.13"
[Sat Apr 28 07:09:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 07:09:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 07:09:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21 appears to have run properly
[Sat Apr 28 07:09:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 07:09:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 07:09:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0501210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly
[Sat Apr 28 07:34:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 203.004000, observed total counts = 222.000000
[Sat Apr 28 07:34:13 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.055113 pixels
[Sat Apr 28 07:34:13 2012] 199.231400 total counts/ 181.676000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.302453
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.055113 pixels
  Position = (116.5, 266.2) = 8 55 22.34 15 0 51.5
  Extent = 6.3" x 2.0", rotation angle = 77
  Source counts = 17.6 +/- 14.1
  Background counts = 181.7
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability