[Tue Dec 27 23:33:47 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (309.1, 297.1) = 0 52 33.95 -72 25 22.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 36.2 +/- 9.2
  Background counts = 12.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Dec 27 23:33:47 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.78'
[Wed Dec 28 02:48:24 2011] Using EEF radius (= 6.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Dec 28 02:48:24 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.82"
[Wed Dec 28 02:48:24 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.936
[Wed Dec 28 02:48:24 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 6.82"
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 04:09:12 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19 appears to have run properly
[Wed Dec 28 05:44:40 2011] Source 17 is offset by 4.499088 and -6.029664 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.263600 x 1.263600, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Dec 28 05:44:40 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Dec 28 05:44:40 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Dec 28 05:44:40 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Dec 28 05:44:40 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Dec 28 05:44:40 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Dec 28 08:28:55 2011] Using EEF radius (= 6.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Dec 28 08:28:55 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.82"
[Wed Dec 28 08:28:55 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.936
[Wed Dec 28 08:28:55 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 6.82"
[Wed Dec 28 09:58:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 09:58:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 09:58:57 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19 appears to have run properly
[Wed Dec 28 09:58:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 09:58:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 09:58:57 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0500980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19 appears to have run properly
[Wed Dec 28 11:38:26 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 135.954000, observed total counts = 136.000000
[Wed Dec 28 11:38:26 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 0.080315 pixels
[Wed Dec 28 11:38:26 2011] 136.535000 total counts/ 119.486000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.559698
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 0.080315 pixels
  Position = (309.1, 297.2) = 0 52 33.95 -72 25 20.7
  Extent = 5.3 (3.5-8.3)" x 1.7 (1.7-2.8)", rotation angle = 79 (49-107) degrees
  Source counts = 17.0 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 119.5
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability