[Tue Apr 10 21:05:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (343.5, 304.8) = 20 34 36.65 60 8 35.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.3 +/- 15.4
  Background counts = 72.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Tue Apr 10 21:05:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.30'
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.08"
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.125
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 44 for pass 0, mean size = 8.08"
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:09 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:09 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Source 44 is offset by -6.920396 and 6.240831 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.928584 x 0.928584, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:20 2012] Source is confused with source 45
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.08"
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:38 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.125
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 8.08"
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:39 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0500730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:49 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 987.948000, observed total counts = 929.000000
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:49 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 0.694100 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 21:06:49 2012] 976.986900 total counts/ 965.419000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.372303
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 0.694100 pixels
  Position = (343.1, 304.2) = 20 34 36.89 60 8 33.7
  Extent = 2.0" x 2.0", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.6 +/- 31.3
  Background counts = 965.4
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability