[Mon Mar 26 21:42:41 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (335.7, 477.5) = 17 19 59.07 26 48 50.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 79.0 +/- 11.9 Background counts = 23.6 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007 [Mon Mar 26 21:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.26' [Mon Mar 26 21:47:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 26 21:47:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.06" [Mon Mar 26 21:47:06 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.673 [Mon Mar 26 21:47:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 13.06" [Tue Mar 27 03:56:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 03:56:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 03:56:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 03:56:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 03:56:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 03:56:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 03:56:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 03:56:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 03:56:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 03:56:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 07:57:55 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 12.742324 pixels away [Tue Mar 27 07:57:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 27 07:57:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 27 07:57:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 27 07:57:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 27 07:57:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 27 07:58:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 27 07:58:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.06" [Tue Mar 27 07:58:31 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.673 [Tue Mar 27 07:58:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 13.06" [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 11:24:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 14.721377 pixels away [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 27 14:52:39 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9