[Mon Mar 26 21:44:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (307.1, 295.0) = 17 20 8.37 26 35 36.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 122.4 +/- 16.6
  Background counts = 29.4
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0009

[Mon Mar 26 21:44:12 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.68'
[Tue Mar 27 05:21:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 05:21:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.77"
[Tue Mar 27 05:21:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.946
[Tue Mar 27 05:21:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 6.77"
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 07:57:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 07:58:15 2012] Source is confused with source 31
[Tue Mar 27 12:21:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 12:21:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.77"
[Tue Mar 27 12:21:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.946
[Tue Mar 27 12:21:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 6.77"
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:24 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Source 17 is offset by 4.367788 and -6.266254 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.834280 x 0.834280, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 616.961000, observed total counts = 607.000000
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 3.005932 pixels
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 7 to 21
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] 628.903300 total counts/ 574.267000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.279945
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 3.005932 pixels
  Position = (304.1, 295.3) = 17 20 9.34 26 35 36.5
  Extent = 13.7 (13.7-27.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 54.6 +/- 25.1
  Background counts = 574.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.001
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 14:52:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9