[Tue Mar 27 23:43:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (320.3, 294.8) = 17 20 3.86 26 35 37.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 68.5 +/- 12.9
  Background counts = 40.0
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Mar 27 23:43:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.60'
[Wed Mar 28 05:44:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.23 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 05:44:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.23"
[Wed Mar 28 05:44:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.749
[Wed Mar 28 05:44:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 7.23"
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 21 centroid is now closest to src. 26
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 07:26:57 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Wed Mar 28 11:31:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.23 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 11:31:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.23"
[Wed Mar 28 11:31:27 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.749
[Wed Mar 28 11:31:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 7.23"
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500670301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Source 28 is offset by -5.475794 and 6.369648 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.415848 x 2.415848, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 12:48:53 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9