[Mon May 20 17:26:46 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (312.5, 224.0) = 12 1 46.51 -18 55 21.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.8 +/- 8.7
  Background counts = 17.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Mon May 20 17:26:47 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.49'
[Mon May 20 19:34:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 20 19:34:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Mon May 20 19:34:01 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.661
[Mon May 20 19:34:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 0, mean size = 9.18"
[Mon May 20 20:46:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 20:46:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.csv
[Mon May 20 20:46:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 20:46:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.csv
[Mon May 20 20:46:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 20 20:46:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 20:46:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.csv
[Mon May 20 20:46:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 20:46:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.csv
[Mon May 20 20:46:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 239.530000, observed total counts = 208.000000
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 29
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 20 20:46:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 20 22:37:10 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 20 22:37:10 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Mon May 20 22:37:10 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.661
[Mon May 20 22:37:10 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 1, mean size = 9.18"
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg exists
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Tue May 21 00:01:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0500070701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Source 29 is offset by -2.466016 and -0.656746 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.311582 x 1.311582, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 21 00:01:41 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9